N1 16SM vs Radeon RX Vega M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking379not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency81.01no data
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026)
GPU code nameVegaGB20B
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date1 February 2018 (8 years ago)1 June 2026 (recently)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5122048
Core clock speed720 MHz1665 MHz
Boost clock speed1190 MHz2418 MHz
Number of transistors4,500 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Wattno data
Texture fill rate38.08309.5
Floating-point processing powerno data9.904 TFLOPS
ROPs824
TMUs32128
Tensor Coresno data64
Ray Tracing Coresno data16
L1 Cacheno data2 MB
L2 Cacheno data50 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 5.0 x16
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedLPDDR5X
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared128 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1067 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data273.2 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x HDMI
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12.0N/A
Shader Model5.0N/A
OpenGL4.6N/A
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan-N/A
CUDA-12.1
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 February 2018 1 June 2026
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm

N1 16SM has an age advantage of 8 years, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega M and N1 16SM. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega M is a desktop graphics card while N1 16SM is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.7 9 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate N1 16SM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega M or N1 16SM, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.