GeForce RTX 4080 Ti Mobile vs Radeon RX Vega M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking377not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency80.44no data
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameVegaAD104
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date1 February 2018 (8 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5127280
Core clock speed720 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1190 MHz1665 MHz
Number of transistors4,500 million35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt175 Watt
Texture fill rate38.08399.6
Floating-point processing powerno data24.24 TFLOPS
ROPs880
TMUs32240

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 4.0 x16
WidthIGPno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared12 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared192 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared16 GB/s
Memory bandwidthno data384.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12.012 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.06.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan-1.3
CUDA-8.9

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 14 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 175 Watt

RX Vega M has 1067% lower power consumption.

RTX 4080 Ti Mobile, on the other hand, has a 250% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega M and GeForce RTX 4080 Ti Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega M is a desktop graphics card while GeForce RTX 4080 Ti Mobile is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.7 9 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 64 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4080 Ti Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega M or GeForce RTX 4080 Ti Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.