GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q vs Radeon RX Vega M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking375not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency80.32no data
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameVegaGA106
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date1 February 2018 (8 years ago)12 January 2021 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5123840
Core clock speed720 MHz817 MHz
Boost clock speed1190 MHz1282 MHz
Number of transistors4,500 million13,250 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt60 Watt
Texture fill rate38.08153.8
Floating-point processing powerno data9.846 TFLOPS
ROPs848
TMUs32120
Tensor Coresno data120
Ray Tracing Coresno data30
L1 Cacheno data3.8 MB
L2 Cacheno data3 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfaceIGPPCIe 4.0 x16
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared6 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared192 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1500 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data288.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12.012 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.06.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.0
Vulkan-1.2
CUDA-8.6
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 February 2018 12 January 2021
Chip lithography 14 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 60 Watt

RX Vega M has 300% lower power consumption.

RTX 3060 Max-Q, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega M and GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega M is a desktop graphics card while GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega M
Radeon RX Vega M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.7 9 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 192 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega M or GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.