Arc Pro B65 vs Radeon RX Vega M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking377not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency80.44no data
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Xe2-HPG (2025−2026)
GPU code nameVegaBMG-G21
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date1 February 2018 (8 years ago)April 2026

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5122560
Core clock speed720 MHz2400 MHz
Boost clock speed1190 MHz2400 MHz
Number of transistors4,500 million19,600 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt200 Watt
Texture fill rate38.08384.0
Floating-point processing powerno data12.29 TFLOPS
ROPs880
TMUs32160
Ray Tracing Coresno data20
L1 Cacheno data5 MB
L2 Cacheno data10 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 5.0 x16
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared32 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2375 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data608.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12.012 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.06.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan-1.4

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 200 Watt

RX Vega M has 1233.3% lower power consumption.

Arc Pro B65, on the other hand, has a 180% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega M and Arc Pro B65. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.7 9 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Arc Pro B65 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega M or Arc Pro B65, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.