Arc Pro B60 vs Radeon RX Vega M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking366not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency79.52no data
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Xe2 (2024)
GPU code nameVegaBMG-G21
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date1 February 2018 (7 years ago)5 September 2025 (recently)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$499

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5122560
Core clock speed720 MHz2000 MHz
Boost clock speed1190 MHz2400 MHz
Number of transistors4,500 million19,600 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt200 Watt
Texture fill rate38.08384.0
Floating-point processing powerno data12.29 TFLOPS
ROPs816
TMUs32160
Ray Tracing Coresno data20
L2 Cacheno data4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 5.0 x8
Lengthno data167 mm
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared24 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared192 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2375 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data456.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data4x mini-DisplayPort 2.1

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12.012 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.06.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan-1.4

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 February 2018 5 September 2025
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 200 Watt

RX Vega M has 1233.3% lower power consumption.

Arc Pro B60, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega M and Arc Pro B60. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega M is a desktop graphics card while Arc Pro B60 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega M
Radeon RX Vega M
Intel Arc Pro B60
Arc Pro B60

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.7 9 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Arc Pro B60 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega M or Arc Pro B60, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.