AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL vs NVIDIA GeForce MX150

General info

Comparison of Radeon RX Vega M GL and GeForce MX150 architecture, market type and release date.
Place in performance rating
GCN 4.0
Code name
Polaris 22
Release date
1 February 2018
17 May 2017

Technical specs

Radeon RX Vega M GL and GeForce MX150's general performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of Radeon RX Vega M GL and GeForce MX150's performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.
Core clock speed
931 MHz
1468 MHz
Boost Clock
1011 MHz
1038 MHz
Transistor count
5,000 million
1,800 million
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm
14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)
65 Watt
10 Watt
Texture fill rate
Floating-point performance
2,588 gflops
1,127 gflops

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Information on Radeon RX Vega M GL and GeForce MX150 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
Laptop size
no data
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
no data


Parameters of memory installed on Radeon RX Vega M GL and GeForce MX150: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors don't have dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
4 GB
Memory bus width
1024 Bit
64 Bit
Memory clock speed
1400 MHz
5012 MHz
Memory bandwidth
179.2 GB/s
40.1 GB/s
Shared memory

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on Radeon RX Vega M GL and GeForce MX150. As a rule, this section is relevant only for desktop reference video cards, since for notebook ones the availability of certain video outputs depends on the laptop model.
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs


Technological solutions and APIs supported by Radeon RX Vega M GL and GeForce MX150. You'll probably need this information if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
Multi Monitor
no data

API support

APIs supported by Radeon RX Vega M GL and GeForce MX150, sometimes including their particular versions.
12 (12_0)
12 (12_1)

Benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmarks performance of Radeon RX Vega M GL and GeForce MX150. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.

Overall benchmark performance

RX Vega M GL 15.71 +43.2%
GeForce MX150 10.97


RX Vega M GL 3405 +43.2%
GeForce MX150 2377

Gaming performance

Let's see how good Radeon RX Vega M GL and GeForce MX150 are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Advantages of AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL

43.2% faster in synthetic tests
Somewhat newer (1 February 2018 vs 17 May 2017)
Wider memory bus (1024 vs 64 bit)
More pipelines (1280 vs 384)
Higher memory bandwidth (179.2 vs 40.1 GB/s)
Tiled Rasterization
Shared Memory (up to Dual-Channel DDR4-2400)

Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce MX150

Less power hungry (10 vs 65 watts)
Vulkan (a contemporary API for graphics acceleration, based on now-discontinued Mantle)
Multi Monitor
OpenGL 4.5

So, RX Vega M GL or MX150?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, Technical City recommends AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL.
Should you still have questions on choice between Radeon RX Vega M GL and GeForce MX150, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Cast your vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favourite video card.
AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL
NVIDIA GeForce MX150

User rating

Here you can see the user rating of the video card, as well as rate it yourself.

Advices and comments

Here you can ask a question about Radeon RX Vega M GL or GeForce MX150, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.
AliExpress WW