Arc A380M vs Radeon RX Vega M GL

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking504not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency10.94no data
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code namePolaris 22DG2-128
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 February 2018 (7 years ago)24 January 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores12801024
Core clock speed931 MHz1550 MHz
Boost clock speed1011 MHz2000 MHz
Number of transistors5,000 million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate80.88128.0
Floating-point processing power2.588 TFLOPS4.096 TFLOPS
ROPs3232
TMUs8064
Tensor Coresno data128
Ray Tracing Coresno data8
L1 Cache320 KBno data
L2 Cache1024 KB4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPMXM-A (3.1)

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB6 GB
Memory bus width1024 Bit96 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz1937 MHz
Memory bandwidth179.2 GB/s186.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 February 2018 24 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 35 Watt

Arc A380M has an age advantage of 4 years, a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 133.3% more advanced lithography process, and 85.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega M GL and Arc A380M. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL
Radeon RX Vega M GL
Intel Arc A380M
Arc A380M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 22 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega M GL on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 17 votes

Rate Arc A380M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega M GL or Arc A380M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.