Arc 140T Mobile vs Radeon RX Vega M GL

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking489not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency10.81no data
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Xe+ (2025)
GPU code namePolaris 22Arrow Lake-H
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 February 2018 (7 years ago)13 January 2025 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores12801024
Core clock speed931 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1011 MHz2350 MHz
Number of transistors5,000 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate80.88150.4
Floating-point processing power2.588 TFLOPS4.813 TFLOPS
ROPs3232
TMUs8064
Tensor Coresno data128
Ray Tracing Coresno data8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 4.0 x8

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2System Shared
Maximum RAM amount4 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width1024 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed700 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth179.2 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 February 2018 13 January 2025
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 35 Watt

Arc 140T Mobile has an age advantage of 6 years, a 180% more advanced lithography process, and 85.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega M GL and Arc 140T Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL
Radeon RX Vega M GL
Intel Arc 140T Mobile
Arc 140T Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 22 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega M GL on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.8 34 votes

Rate Arc 140T Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega M GL or Arc 140T Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.