Radeon Pro 570X vs RX Vega M GL / 870

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking427not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency15.03no data
ArchitectureVega (2017−2020)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameVega Kaby Lake-GPolaris 20
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date7 January 2018 (7 years ago)18 March 2019 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores12801792
Core clock speed931 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speed1011 MHz1105 MHz
Number of transistorsno data5,700 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt120 Watt
Texture fill rateno data123.8
Floating-point processing powerno data3.96 TFLOPS
ROPsno data32
TMUsno data112
L1 Cacheno data448 KB
L2 Cacheno data2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus widthno data256 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1700 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data217.6 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 (12_0)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.0
Vulkan-1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 January 2018 18 March 2019
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 120 Watt

RX Vega M GL / 870 has 84.6% lower power consumption.

Pro 570X, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870 and Radeon Pro 570X. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870 is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Pro 570X is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870
Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870
AMD Radeon Pro 570X
Radeon Pro 570X

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.5 120 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 46 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 570X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870 or Radeon Pro 570X, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.