HD Graphics 10EU vs Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking434not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency15.01no data
ArchitectureVega (2017−2020)Generation 7.5 (2013)
GPU code nameVega Kaby Lake-GHaswell GT1
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date7 January 2018 (8 years ago)29 April 2013 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores128080
Core clock speed931 MHz200 MHz
Boost clock speed1011 MHz1000 MHz
Manufacturing process technology14 nm22 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rateno data10.00
Floating-point processing powerno data0.16 TFLOPS
ROPsno data1
TMUsno data10

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Interfaceno dataRing Bus
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2System Shared
Maximum RAM amount4 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus widthno dataSystem Shared
Memory clock speedno dataSystem Shared
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataMotherboard Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 (11_1)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGLno data4.3
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 January 2018 29 April 2013
Chip lithography 14 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 45 Watt

RX Vega M GL / 870 has an age advantage of 4 years, and a 57% more advanced lithography process.

HD Graphics 10EU, on the other hand, has 44% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870 and HD Graphics 10EU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870 is a notebook graphics card while HD Graphics 10EU is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.6 121 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.4 7 votes

Rate HD Graphics 10EU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870 or HD Graphics 10EU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.