Radeon Graphics 384SP vs RX Vega M GH

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking376not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency12.07no data
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)GCN 5.1 (2018−2022)
GPU code namePolaris 22Cezanne
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 February 2018 (8 years ago)13 April 2021 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1536384
Core clock speed1063 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1190 MHz1700 MHz
Number of transistors5,000 million9,800 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate114.240.80
Floating-point processing power3.656 TFLOPS1.306 TFLOPS
ROPs648
TMUs9624
L1 Cache384 KBno data
L2 Cache1024 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceIGPIGP
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2System Shared
Maximum RAM amount4 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width1024 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed800 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth204.8 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.7 (6.4)
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.1
Vulkan1.2.1311.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 February 2018 13 April 2021
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 45 Watt

Graphics 384SP has an age advantage of 3 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 122% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega M GH and Radeon Graphics 384SP. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega M GH is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Graphics 384SP is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 51 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega M GH on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 40 votes

Rate Radeon Graphics 384SP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega M GH or Radeon Graphics 384SP, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.