GeForce 7900 GTO vs Radeon RX Vega M GH

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking376not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency12.07no data
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code namePolaris 22G71
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 February 2018 (8 years ago)1 October 2006 (19 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1536no data
Core clock speed1063 MHz650 MHz
Boost clock speed1190 MHzno data
Number of transistors5,000 million278 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt81 Watt
Texture fill rate114.215.60
Floating-point processing power3.656 TFLOPSno data
ROPs6416
TMUs9624
L1 Cache384 KBno data
L2 Cache1024 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceIGPPCIe 1.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount4 GB512 MB
Memory bus width1024 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz660 MHz
Memory bandwidth204.8 GB/s42.24 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model6.43.0
OpenGL4.62.1
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 February 2018 1 October 2006
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 81 Watt

RX Vega M GH has an age advantage of 11 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 543% more advanced lithography process.

7900 GTO, on the other hand, has 23% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega M GH and GeForce 7900 GTO. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega M GH is a notebook graphics card while GeForce 7900 GTO is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 51 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega M GH on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 10 votes

Rate GeForce 7900 GTO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega M GH or GeForce 7900 GTO, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.