Iris Xe Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake) vs Radeon RX Vega 9
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 670 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 25.84 | no data |
| Architecture | Vega (2017−2020) | Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) |
| GPU code name | Vega Raven Ridge | Alder Lake Xe |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 26 October 2017 (8 years ago) | 4 January 2022 (3 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 576 | 64 |
| Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz | 1400 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Shared memory | - | + |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| Quick Sync | no data | + |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12_1 | DirectX 12_1 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 26 October 2017 | 4 January 2022 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 10 nm |
Iris Xe Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake) has an age advantage of 4 years, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega 9 and Iris Xe Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake). We've got no test results to judge.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
