ATI FireGL 9800 X2-256 vs Radeon RX Vega 9

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking670not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency25.88no data
ArchitectureVega (2017−2020)Rage 9 (2003−2006)
GPU code nameVega Raven RidgeR360
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date26 October 2017 (8 years ago)1 March 2003 (22 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores576no data
Core clock speedno data380 MHz
Boost clock speed1300 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data117 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Wattno data
Texture fill rateno data3.040
ROPsno data8
TMUsno data8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataAGP 8x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x Molex

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataDDR2
Maximum RAM amountno data256 MB
Memory bus widthno data256 Bit
Memory clock speedno data350 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data22.4 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_19.0
OpenGLno data2.0
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 26 October 2017 1 March 2003
Chip lithography 14 nm 150 nm

RX Vega 9 has an age advantage of 14 years, and a 971.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega 9 and FireGL 9800 X2-256. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega 9 is a notebook graphics card while FireGL 9800 X2-256 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 9
Radeon RX Vega 9
ATI FireGL 9800 X2-256
FireGL 9800 X2-256

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 29 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 9 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate FireGL 9800 X2-256 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega 9 or FireGL 9800 X2-256, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.