ATI All-In-Wonder 128 PCI vs Radeon RX Vega 9

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking678not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency26.03no data
ArchitectureVega (2017−2020)Rage 4 (1998−1999)
GPU code nameVega Raven RidgeRage 4
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date26 October 2017 (8 years ago)16 June 1999 (26 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores576no data
Core clock speedno data90 MHz
Boost clock speed1300 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data8 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm250 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Wattno data
Texture fill rateno data0.36
ROPsno data4
TMUsno data4

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCI
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataSDR
Maximum RAM amountno data16 MB
Memory bus widthno data64 Bit
Memory clock speedno data90 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data720.0 MB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x VGA, 2x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_16.0
OpenGLno data1.2
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 26 October 2017 16 June 1999
Chip lithography 14 nm 250 nm

RX Vega 9 has an age advantage of 18 years, and a 1686% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega 9 and All-In-Wonder 128 PCI. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega 9 is a notebook graphics card while All-In-Wonder 128 PCI is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 29 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 9 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 5 votes

Rate All-In-Wonder 128 PCI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega 9 or All-In-Wonder 128 PCI, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.