HD 8770M vs RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)

#ad
Buy
VS

Combined performance score

RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
4.48
+52.4%

RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) outperforms HD 8770M by 52% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking617739
Place by popularity36not in top-100
Value for moneyno data0.33
ArchitectureVega (2017−2021)GCN (2011−2017)
GPU code nameVega Raven RidgeMars
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date26 October 2017 (6 years old)16 November 2012 (11 years old)
Current priceno data$338
Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512384
Core clock speedno data775 MHz
Boost clock speed1200 MHz825 MHz
Number of transistorsno data950 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Wattno data
Texture fill rateno data19.80
Floating-point performanceno data633.6 gflops

Size and compatibility

Information on Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) and Radeon HD 8770M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x8

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountno data2 GB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data4500 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data72 GB/s
Shared memory--

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 (11_1)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkanno data1.2.131

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) 4.48
+52.4%
HD 8770M 2.94

RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) outperforms HD 8770M by 52% in our combined benchmark results.


3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) 10294
+20.7%
HD 8770M 8530

RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) outperforms HD 8770M by 21% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) 3557
+83.9%
HD 8770M 1934

RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) outperforms HD 8770M by 84% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD18
−200%
54
+200%
4K10
+66.7%
6−7
−66.7%

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 9
+50%
6−7
−50%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 15
+275%
4−5
−275%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10
+66.7%
6−7
−66.7%
Battlefield 5 24
+300%
6−7
−300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16
+33.3%
12−14
−33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 9
+50%
6−7
−50%
Far Cry 5 12
+200%
4−5
−200%
Far Cry New Dawn 13
+225%
4−5
−225%
Forza Horizon 4 26
+225%
8−9
−225%
Hitman 3 10−11
+66.7%
6−7
−66.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12
+140%
5−6
−140%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12
+100%
6−7
−100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12
+33.3%
9−10
−33.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 12
+500%
2−3
−500%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 11
+175%
4−5
−175%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Battlefield 5 22
+267%
6−7
−267%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6
−100%
12−14
+100%
Cyberpunk 2077 6
+0%
6−7
+0%
Far Cry 5 10
+150%
4−5
−150%
Far Cry New Dawn 14
+250%
4−5
−250%
Forza Horizon 4 30
+275%
8−9
−275%
Hitman 3 10−11
+66.7%
6−7
−66.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%
Metro Exodus 7
+75%
4−5
−75%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
+50%
6−7
−50%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 13
+85.7%
7−8
−85.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8
+100%
4−5
−100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Battlefield 5 23
+283%
6−7
−283%
Cyberpunk 2077 5
−20%
6−7
+20%
Far Cry 5 9
+125%
4−5
−125%
Far Cry New Dawn 14
+250%
4−5
−250%
Forza Horizon 4 23
+188%
8−9
−188%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Hitman 3 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%
Metro Exodus 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 0−1

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Hitman 3 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 3
+200%
1−2
−200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4
+300%
1−2
−300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Battlefield 5 6
+100%
3−4
−100%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%
Forza Horizon 4 9
+80%
5−6
−80%

This is how RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) and HD 8770M compete in popular games:

1080p resolution:

  • HD 8770M is 200% faster than RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)

4K resolution:

  • RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) is 66.7% faster than HD 8770M

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) is 500% faster than the HD 8770M.
  • in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the HD 8770M is 100% faster than the RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000).

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) is ahead in 48 tests (91%)
  • HD 8770M is ahead in 2 tests (4%)
  • there's a draw in 3 tests (6%)

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 4.48 2.94
Recency 26 October 2017 16 November 2012
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm

The Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 8770M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
AMD Radeon HD 8770M
Radeon HD 8770M

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 1057 votes

Rate AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate AMD Radeon HD 8770M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.