Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD vs Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking618not rated
Place by popularity50not in top-100
ArchitectureVega (2017−2021)Gen. 4.5 (2008)
GPU code nameVega Raven RidgeMontevina
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date26 October 2017 (6 years old)1 October 2008 (15 years old)

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores51210
Core clock speedno data533 MHz
Boost clock speed1200 MHzno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Wattno data

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Shared memory-+

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_110

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) 15770
+10776%
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD 145

Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) outperforms Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD by 10776% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

Advantages and disadvantages


Recency 26 October 2017 1 October 2008
Chip lithography 14 nm 65 nm

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) and Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User Ratings

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 1097 votes

Rate AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 160 votes

Rate Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.