Radeon 630 vs RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
2020
15 Watt
9.07
+177%

RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) outperforms 630 by a whopping 177% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking449705
Place by popularity40not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.50
ArchitectureVega (2017−2021)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameVegaLexa
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date7 January 2020 (4 years ago)12 August 2019 (4 years ago)
Current priceno data$65

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512512
Boost clock speed2100 MHz1219 MHz
Number of transistorsno data2,200 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rateno data38.98

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) and Radeon 630 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountno data4 GB
Memory bus widthno data64 Bit
Memory clock speedno data6000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data112.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMIno data+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112
OpenGLno data4.6
Vulkanno data+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD22
+214%
7−8
−214%
1440p16
+220%
5−6
−220%
4K10
+233%
3−4
−233%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 19
+217%
6−7
−217%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
+280%
5−6
−280%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 20 0−1
Battlefield 5 27−30
+367%
6−7
−367%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
+186%
7−8
−186%
Cyberpunk 2077 14
+133%
6−7
−133%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+125%
12−14
−125%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
+257%
7−8
−257%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+167%
12−14
−167%
Hitman 3 25
+213%
8−9
−213%
Horizon Zero Dawn 44
+159%
16−18
−159%
Metro Exodus 35
+775%
4−5
−775%
Red Dead Redemption 2 33
+313%
8−9
−313%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 32
+146%
12−14
−146%
Watch Dogs: Legion 21
+600%
3−4
−600%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
+280%
5−6
−280%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16 0−1
Battlefield 5 27−30
+367%
6−7
−367%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
+186%
7−8
−186%
Cyberpunk 2077 10
+66.7%
6−7
−66.7%
Far Cry 5 30
+150%
12−14
−150%
Far Cry New Dawn 13
+85.7%
7−8
−85.7%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+167%
12−14
−167%
Hitman 3 16
+100%
8−9
−100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 33
+94.1%
16−18
−94.1%
Metro Exodus 25
+525%
4−5
−525%
Red Dead Redemption 2 25
+213%
8−9
−213%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 23
+76.9%
12−14
−76.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21
+200%
7−8
−200%
Watch Dogs: Legion 17
+467%
3−4
−467%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
+280%
5−6
−280%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
+186%
7−8
−186%
Cyberpunk 2077 9
+50%
6−7
−50%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+125%
12−14
−125%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+167%
12−14
−167%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24
+41.2%
16−18
−41.2%
Metro Exodus 24
+500%
4−5
−500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14
+100%
7−8
−100%
Watch Dogs: Legion 12
+300%
3−4
−300%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 21
+163%
8−9
−163%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
+200%
6−7
−200%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
+275%
4−5
−275%
Hitman 3 14
+1300%
1−2
−1300%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 11
+267%
3−4
−267%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
+83.3%
6−7
−83.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 5
+150%
2−3
−150%
Far Cry 5 16
+220%
5−6
−220%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
+240%
5−6
−240%
Horizon Zero Dawn 20
+150%
8−9
−150%
Metro Exodus 17
+183%
6−7
−183%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16
+220%
5−6
−220%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
+200%
3−4
−200%
Watch Dogs: Legion 8
+700%
1−2
−700%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry 5 23
+130%
10−11
−130%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9 0−1
Hitman 3 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Horizon Zero Dawn 9−10
+200%
3−4
−200%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Battlefield 5 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
+1000%
1−2
−1000%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10
+233%
3−4
−233%
Metro Exodus 8
+60%
5−6
−60%
Watch Dogs: Legion 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
+125%
4−5
−125%

This is how RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) and Radeon 630 compete in popular games:

  • RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) is 214% faster in 1080p
  • RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) is 220% faster in 1440p
  • RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) is 233% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Hitman 3, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) is 1300% faster than the Radeon 630.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) surpassed Radeon 630 in all 60 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.07 3.28
Recency 7 January 2020 12 August 2019
Chip lithography 7 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 50 Watt

The Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 630 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
AMD Radeon 630
Radeon 630

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 878 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 31 vote

Rate Radeon 630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.