ATI Mobility Radeon HD 530v vs RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking550not rated
Place by popularity37not in top-100
Power efficiency42.81no data
ArchitectureVega (2017−2020)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameVegaM92
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date7 January 2020 (6 years ago)5 May 2010 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores51280
Core clock speedno data450 MHz
Boost clock speed2100 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data242 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt10 Watt
Texture fill rateno data3.600
Floating-point processing powerno data0.072 TFLOPS
ROPsno data4
TMUsno data8
L1 Cacheno data16 KB
L2 Cacheno data64 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataMXM-A (3.0)
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR3
Maximum RAM amountno data512 MB
Memory bus widthno data64 Bit
Memory clock speedno data500 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data8 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_110.1 (10_1)
Shader Modelno data4.1
OpenGLno data3.3
OpenCLno data1.1
Vulkan-N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 January 2020 5 May 2010
Chip lithography 7 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 10 Watt

RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) has an age advantage of 9 years, and a 686% more advanced lithography process.

ATI Mobility HD 530v, on the other hand, has 50% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) and Mobility Radeon HD 530v. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 1705 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 19 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 530v on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) or Mobility Radeon HD 530v, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.