Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3150 vs Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking	470	not rated
Place by popularity	39	not in top-100
Architecture	Vega (2017−2020)	Gen. 4 (2007−2010)
GPU code name	Vega	Pineview
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	7 January 2020 (4 years ago)	10 January 2010 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	512	2
Boost clock speed	2100 MHz	200 MHz
Number of transistors	no data	123 Million
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm	45 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Shared memory

-

+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX

12_1

no data

Pros & cons summary

---

Recency	7 January 2020	10 January 2010
Chip lithography	7 nm	45 nm

---

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

---