GeForce GT 230 OEM vs Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking548not rated
Place by popularity28not in top-100
Power efficiency42.04no data
ArchitectureVega (2017−2020)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameVegaG92B
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date7 January 2020 (5 years ago)27 April 2009 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores51296
Core clock speedno data500 MHz
Boost clock speed2100 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data754 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rateno data24.00
Floating-point processing powerno data0.24 TFLOPS
ROPsno data12
TMUsno data48
L2 Cacheno data48 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 2.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataDDR2
Maximum RAM amountno data1536 MB
Memory bus widthno data192 Bit
Memory clock speedno data500 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data24 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_111.1 (10_0)
Shader Modelno data4.0
OpenGLno data3.3
OpenCLno data1.1
Vulkan-N/A
CUDA-1.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 January 2020 27 April 2009
Chip lithography 7 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 75 Watt

RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) has an age advantage of 10 years, a 685.7% more advanced lithography process, and 400% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) and GeForce GT 230 OEM. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) is a notebook graphics card while GeForce GT 230 OEM is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 230 OEM
GeForce GT 230 OEM

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 1617 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 6 votes

Rate GeForce GT 230 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) or GeForce GT 230 OEM, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.