Arc 130V Mobile vs Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking548not rated
Place by popularity28not in top-100
Power efficiency42.09no data
ArchitectureVega (2017−2020)Xe2-LPG (2024)
GPU code nameVegaLunar Lake
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date7 January 2020 (5 years ago)24 September 2024 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512896
Core clock speedno data300 MHz
Boost clock speed2100 MHz1850 MHz
Manufacturing process technology7 nm3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt37 Watt
Texture fill rateno data103.6
Floating-point processing powerno data3.315 TFLOPS
ROPsno data28
TMUsno data56
Tensor Coresno data112
Ray Tracing Coresno data7
L2 Cacheno data4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x8

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountno dataSystem Shared
Memory bus widthno dataSystem Shared
Memory clock speedno dataSystem Shared
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 January 2020 24 September 2024
Chip lithography 7 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 37 Watt

RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) has 146.7% lower power consumption.

Arc 130V Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) and Arc 130V Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
Intel Arc 130V Mobile
Arc 130V Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 1624 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 21 votes

Rate Arc 130V Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) or Arc 130V Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.