Tesla V100 PCIe vs Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking671not rated
Place by popularity39not in top-100
Power efficiency20.48no data
ArchitectureVega (2017−2020)Volta (2017−2020)
GPU code nameVega Raven RidgeGV100
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date26 October 2017 (7 years ago)21 June 2017 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5125120
Core clock speed300 MHz1246 MHz
Boost clock speed1200 MHz1380 MHz
Number of transistors9,800 million21,100 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate57.60441.6
Floating-point processing power1.843 TFLOPSno data
ROPs8128
TMUs32320

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 3.0 x16
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedHBM2
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared16 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared4096 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1758 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data900.1 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12.0
Shader Model6.45.0
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.12.0
Vulkan1.2-
CUDA-7.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 26 October 2017 21 June 2017
Chip lithography 14 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 250 Watt

RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) has an age advantage of 4 months, and 1566.7% lower power consumption.

Tesla V100 PCIe, on the other hand, has a 16.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) and Tesla V100 PCIe. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) is a notebook card while Tesla V100 PCIe is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe
Tesla V100 PCIe

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 1574 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 116 votes

Rate Tesla V100 PCIe on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) or Tesla V100 PCIe, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.