Radeon RX Vega 2 vs RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
General info
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in performance ranking | 618 | not rated |
Place by popularity | 48 | not in top-100 |
Architecture | Vega (2017−2021) | Vega (2017−2021) |
GPU code name | Vega Raven Ridge | Vega Raven Ridge |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Release date | 26 October 2017 (6 years ago) | 7 January 2018 (6 years ago) |
Current price | no data | $351 |
Technical specs
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 512 | 128 |
Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | 1100 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 12 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 15 Watt |
Memory
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Shared memory | - | - |
API support
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 12_1 | 12_1 |
Advantages and disadvantages
Recency | 26 October 2017 | 7 January 2018 |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 12 nm |
We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) and Radeon RX Vega 2. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar GPU comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.