Radeon Instinct MI210 vs RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking729not rated
Place by popularity44not in top-100
Power efficiency21.30no data
ArchitectureVega (2017−2020)CDNA 2.0 (2021)
GPU code nameVega Raven RidgeAldebaran
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date26 October 2017 (8 years ago)December 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5126656
Core clock speed300 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speed1200 MHz1700 MHz
Number of transistors9,800 million58,200 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate57.60707.2
Floating-point processing power1.843 TFLOPS22.63 TFLOPS
ROPs8no data
TMUs32416
L1 Cacheno data1.6 MB
L2 Cacheno data16 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedHBM2e
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared64 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared4096 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1600 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data1,638 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)N/A
Shader Model6.4N/A
OpenGL4.6N/A
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.2N/A

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 14 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 300 Watt

RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) has 1900% lower power consumption.

Instinct MI210, on the other hand, has a 133% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) and Radeon Instinct MI210. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Instinct MI210 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 1851 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 21 votes

Rate Radeon Instinct MI210 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) or Radeon Instinct MI210, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.