ATI Radeon HD 3450 X2 vs RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking721not rated
Place by popularity40not in top-100
Power efficiency21.28no data
ArchitectureVega (2017−2020)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameVega Raven RidgeRV620
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date26 October 2017 (8 years ago)10 December 2007 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores51240 ×2
Core clock speed300 MHz600 MHz
Boost clock speed1200 MHzno data
Number of transistors9,800 million181 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate57.602.400 ×2
Floating-point processing power1.843 TFLOPS0.048 TFLOPS ×2
ROPs84 ×2
TMUs324 ×2
L2 Cacheno data64 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data168 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR2
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared512 MB ×2
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit ×2
Memory clock speedSystem Shared500 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data8 GB/s ×2
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DMS-59

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)10.1 (10_1)
Shader Model6.44.1
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL2.1N/A
Vulkan1.2N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 26 October 2017 10 December 2007
Chip lithography 14 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 50 Watt

RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) has an age advantage of 9 years, a 292.9% more advanced lithography process, and 233.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) and Radeon HD 3450 X2. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) is a notebook graphics card while Radeon HD 3450 X2 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
ATI Radeon HD 3450 X2
Radeon HD 3450 X2

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 1787 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2 2 votes

Rate Radeon HD 3450 X2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) or Radeon HD 3450 X2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.