ATI Radeon 9250 vs RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking	671	1541
Place by popularity	33	not in top-100
Power efficiency	20.62	no data
Architecture	Vega (2017−2020)	Rage 7 (2001−2006)
GPU code name	Vega Raven Ridge	RV280
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	26 October 2017 (7 years ago)	1 March 2004 (20 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	512	no data
Core clock speed	300 MHz	240 MHz
Boost clock speed	1200 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	9,800 million	36 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	no data
Texture fill rate	57.60	0.96
Floating-point processing power	1.843 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	8	4
TMUs	32	4

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	IGP	AGP 8x
Width	no data	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	System Shared	DDR
Maximum RAM amount	System Shared	64 MB
Memory bus width	System Shared	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	System Shared	200 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	3.2 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	8.1
Shader Model	6.4	no data
OpenGL	4.6	1.4
OpenCL	2.1	N/A
Vulkan	1.2	N/A

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

---

---

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	18	no data
4K	10	no data

FPS performance in popular games

Pros & cons summary

---

Recency	26 October 2017	1 March 2004
Chip lithography	14 nm	150 nm

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

---