GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh 4 GB vs Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking702not rated
Place by popularity46not in top-100
Power efficiency21.08no data
ArchitectureVega (2017−2020)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameVega Raven RidgeGA107
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date26 October 2017 (7 years ago)6 July 2022 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5122560
Core clock speed300 MHz652 MHz
Boost clock speed1200 MHz1207 MHz
Number of transistors9,800 million8,700 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate57.6096.56
Floating-point processing power1.843 TFLOPS6.18 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs3280
Tensor Coresno data80
Ray Tracing Coresno data20

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared4 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data224.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.21.3
CUDA-8.6
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 26 October 2017 6 July 2022
Chip lithography 14 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 45 Watt

RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) has 200% lower power consumption.

RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh 4 GB, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) and GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh 4 GB. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh 4 GB
GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh 4 GB

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 1706 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 60 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh 4 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) or GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh 4 GB, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.