ATI 3D Rage LT PRO AGP vs Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking706not rated
Place by popularity46not in top-100
Power efficiency21.08no data
ArchitectureVega (2017−2020)no data
GPU code nameVega Raven RidgeRage LT
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date26 October 2017 (7 years ago)1 November 1997 (27 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512no data
Core clock speed300 MHz75 MHz
Boost clock speed1200 MHzno data
Number of transistors9,800 million8 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm350 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Wattno data
Texture fill rate57.600.08
Floating-point processing power1.843 TFLOPSno data
ROPs81
TMUs321

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPAGP 2x
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSDR
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared8 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared100 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data800 MB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)6.0
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.61.1
OpenCL2.1None
Vulkan1.2-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 26 October 2017 1 November 1997
Chip lithography 14 nm 350 nm

RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) has an age advantage of 19 years, and a 2400% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) and 3D Rage LT PRO AGP. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) is a notebook graphics card while 3D Rage LT PRO AGP is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
ATI 3D Rage LT PRO AGP
3D Rage LT PRO AGP

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 1712 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 3 votes

Rate 3D Rage LT PRO AGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) or 3D Rage LT PRO AGP, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.