ATI FirePro V8750 vs Radeon RX Vega 64

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking174not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation16.62no data
Power efficiency8.68no data
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameVega 10RV770
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date7 August 2017 (8 years ago)28 July 2008 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$499 $1,799

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4096800
Core clock speed1247 MHz750 MHz
Boost clock speed1546 MHzno data
Number of transistors12,500 million956 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)295 Watt151 Watt
Texture fill rate395.830.00
Floating-point processing power12.66 TFLOPS1.2 TFLOPS
ROPs6416
TMUs25640
L1 Cache1 MB160 KB
L2 Cache4 MB256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length279 mm254 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pin2x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB2 GB
Memory bus width2048 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed945 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidth483.8 GB/s115.2 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)10.1 (10_1)
Shader Model6.44.1
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL2.01.1
Vulkan1.1.125N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 August 2017 28 July 2008
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 295 Watt 151 Watt

RX Vega 64 has an age advantage of 9 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 292.9% more advanced lithography process.

ATI V8750, on the other hand, has 95.4% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega 64 and FirePro V8750. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega 64 is a desktop graphics card while FirePro V8750 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
Radeon RX Vega 64
ATI FirePro V8750
FirePro V8750

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 865 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 64 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 2 votes

Rate FirePro V8750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega 64 or FirePro V8750, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.