Radeon Instinct MI355X vs RX Vega 64 Nano

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)CDNA 4.0 (2025)
GPU code nameVega 10CDNA Next
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date1 October 2017 (7 years ago)2025 (recently)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores409616384
Core clock speed1156 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speed1247 MHz2400 MHz
Number of transistors12,500 million185,000 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt1400 Watt
Texture fill rate319.22,457.6
Floating-point processing powerno data78.64 TFLOPS
ROPs64no data
TMUs2561024
Tensor Coresno data1024
L1 Cacheno data4 MB
L2 Cacheno data16 MB
L3 Cacheno data256 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Length152 mmno data
Width2-slotOAM Module
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2HBM3e
Maximum RAM amount8 GB288 GB
Memory bus width2048 Bit8192 Bit
Memory clock speed1600 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth409.6 GB/s8.19 TB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12.0N/A
Shader Model5.0N/A
OpenGL4.6N/A
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan-N/A
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 288 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 1400 Watt

RX Vega 64 Nano has 460% lower power consumption.

Instinct MI355X, on the other hand, has a 3500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 366.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano and Radeon Instinct MI355X. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano is a desktop graphics card while Radeon Instinct MI355X is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano
Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano
AMD Radeon Instinct MI355X
Radeon Instinct MI355X

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.8 4 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Radeon Instinct MI355X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano or Radeon Instinct MI355X, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.