RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation vs Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameVega 10AD103
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date1 October 2017 (8 years ago)21 March 2023 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores40969728
Core clock speed1156 MHz930 MHz
Boost clock speed1247 MHz1680 MHz
Number of transistors12,500 million45,900 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt120 Watt
Texture fill rate319.2510.7
Floating-point processing powerno data32.69 TFLOPS
ROPs64112
TMUs256304
Tensor Coresno data304
Ray Tracing Coresno data76
L1 Cacheno data9.5 MB
L2 Cacheno data64 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length152 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB16 GB
Memory bus width2048 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1600 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth409.6 GB/s576.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortPortable Device Dependent
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12.012 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.06.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan-1.3
CUDA-8.9
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 October 2017 21 March 2023
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 120 Watt

RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation has an age advantage of 5 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 180% more advanced lithography process, and 108% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano and RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano is a desktop graphics card while RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 5 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano or RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.