Radeon Instinct MI50 vs RX Vega 64 Liquid

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)GCN 5.1 (2018−2022)
GPU code nameVega 10Vega 20
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date8 August 2017 (7 years ago)18 November 2018 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores40963840
Core clock speed1406 MHz1200 MHz
Boost clock speed1677 MHz1746 MHz
Number of transistorsno data13,230 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate429.3419.0
Floating-point processing powerno data13.41 TFLOPS
ROPs6464
TMUs256240

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pin2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2HBM2
Maximum RAM amount8 GB16 GB
Memory bus width2048 Bit4096 Bit
Memory clock speed1890 MHz1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth483.8 GB/s1.02 TB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort1x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12.012 (12_1)
Shader Model5.06.7
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL2.02.1
Vulkan-1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 8 August 2017 18 November 2018
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 300 Watt

RX Vega 64 Liquid has 33.3% lower power consumption.

Instinct MI50, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid and Radeon Instinct MI50. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid is a desktop card while Radeon Instinct MI50 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid
Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid
AMD Radeon Instinct MI50
Radeon Instinct MI50

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 26 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.8 13 votes

Rate Radeon Instinct MI50 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.