Iris Xe Graphics 80EU vs Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Generation 12.2 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameVega 10Raptor Lake GT1
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date8 August 2017 (8 years ago)4 January 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4096640
Core clock speed1406 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1677 MHz1450 MHz
Manufacturing process technology14 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate429.358.00
Floating-point processing powerno data1.856 TFLOPS
ROPs6420
TMUs25640

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16Ring Bus
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2System Shared
Maximum RAM amount8 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width2048 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1890 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth483.8 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortPortable Device Dependent
HDMI+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12.012 (12_1)
Shader Model5.06.6
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan-1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 8 August 2017 4 January 2023
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 15 Watt

Iris Xe Graphics 80EU has an age advantage of 5 years, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 1400% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid and Iris Xe Graphics 80EU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid is a desktop graphics card while Iris Xe Graphics 80EU is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid
Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid
Intel Iris Xe Graphics 80EU
Iris Xe Graphics 80EU

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 27 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 249 votes

Rate Iris Xe Graphics 80EU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid or Iris Xe Graphics 80EU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.