GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile vs Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated272
Place by popularitynot in top-10067
Power efficiencyno data29.27
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameVega 10GN20-P0-R 6 GB
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date8 August 2017 (8 years ago)6 January 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores40962560
Core clock speed1406 MHz1237 MHz
Boost clock speed1677 MHz1492 MHz
Manufacturing process technology14 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt60 Watt (35 - 80 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate429.3no data
ROPs64no data
TMUs256no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB6 GB
Memory bus width2048 Bit96 Bit
Memory clock speed1890 MHz12000 MHz
Memory bandwidth483.8 GB/sno data
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortno data
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12.012_2
Shader Model5.0no data
OpenGL4.5no data
OpenCL2.0no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 8 August 2017 6 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 60 Watt

RX Vega 64 Liquid has a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount.

RTX 3050 6GB Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, a 75% more advanced lithography process, and 275% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid and GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid is a desktop graphics card while GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid
Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 28 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1005 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid or GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.