ATI Radeon Xpress 1200 IGP vs RX Vega 64 Liquid Limited Edition

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)R400 (2004−2008)
GPU code nameVega 10RS600
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date8 August 2017 (8 years ago)28 February 2007 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4096no data
Core clock speed1406 MHz501 MHz
Boost clock speed1677 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data120 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)225 Wattno data
Texture fill rate429.32.004
ROPs644
TMUs2564

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2System Shared
Maximum RAM amount8 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width2048 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1890 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth483.8 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12.09.0b (9_2)
Shader Model5.0no data
OpenGL4.52.0
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan-N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 8 August 2017 28 February 2007
Chip lithography 14 nm 90 nm

RX Vega 64 Liquid Limited Edition has an age advantage of 10 years, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Limited Edition and Radeon Xpress 1200 IGP. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Limited Edition is a desktop graphics card while Radeon Xpress 1200 IGP is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Limited Edition
Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Limited Edition
ATI Radeon Xpress 1200 IGP
Radeon Xpress 1200 IGP

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 7 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Limited Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate Radeon Xpress 1200 IGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Limited Edition or Radeon Xpress 1200 IGP, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.