Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano vs RX Vega 64 Liquid Limited Edition

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameVega 10Vega 10
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date8 August 2017 (8 years ago)1 October 2017 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores40964096
Core clock speed1406 MHz1156 MHz
Boost clock speed1677 MHz1247 MHz
Number of transistorsno data12,500 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate429.3319.2
ROPs6464
TMUs256256

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mm152 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pin2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2HBM2
Maximum RAM amount8 GB8 GB
Memory bus width2048 Bit2048 Bit
Memory clock speed1890 MHz1600 MHz
Memory bandwidth483.8 GB/s409.6 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI++

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12.012.0
Shader Model5.05.0
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL2.02.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 8 August 2017 1 October 2017
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 250 Watt

RX Vega 64 Liquid Limited Edition has 11.1% lower power consumption.

RX Vega 64 Nano, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 month.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Limited Edition and Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Limited Edition
Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Limited Edition
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano
Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 7 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Limited Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 5 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Limited Edition or Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.