GeForce FX 5700 Engineering Sample vs Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Limited Edition

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Rankine (2003−2005)
GPU code nameVega 10NV36S
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date8 August 2017 (8 years ago)18 August 2003 (22 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4096no data
Core clock speed1406 MHz425 MHz
Boost clock speed1677 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data82 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate429.31.700
ROPs644
TMUs2564

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16AGP 8x
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pin1x Molex

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2DDR
Maximum RAM amount8 GB128 MB
Memory bus width2048 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1890 MHz250 MHz
Memory bandwidth483.8 GB/s8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12.09.0a
Shader Model5.0no data
OpenGL4.51.5 (full) 2.0 (partial)
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan-N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 8 August 2017 18 August 2003
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 128 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 25 Watt

RX Vega 64 Liquid Limited Edition has an age advantage of 13 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 828.6% more advanced lithography process.

FX 5700 Engineering Sample, on the other hand, has 800% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Limited Edition and GeForce FX 5700 Engineering Sample. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Limited Edition
Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Limited Edition
NVIDIA GeForce FX 5700 Engineering Sample
GeForce FX 5700 Engineering Sample

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 7 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Limited Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1 vote

Rate GeForce FX 5700 Engineering Sample on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Limited Edition or GeForce FX 5700 Engineering Sample, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.