i752 vs Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Generation 1.0 (1998−2002)
GPU code nameVega 10Portola
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date7 August 2017 (8 years ago)27 April 1999 (26 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$699 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4096no data
Core clock speed1408 MHz100 MHz
Boost clock speed1668 MHzno data
Number of transistors12,500 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)345 Wattno data
Texture fill rate427.00.1
Floating-point processing power13.66 TFLOPSno data
ROPs641
TMUs2561
L1 Cache1 MBno data
L2 Cache4 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16AGP 2x
Length282 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2SDR
Maximum RAM amount8 GB16 MB
Memory bus width2048 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed945 MHz133 MHz
Memory bandwidth483.8 GB/s1.064 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort1x VGA, 2x S-Video
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)7.0
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.61.2
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.1.125N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 August 2017 27 April 1999
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 16 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 150 nm

RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling has an age advantage of 18 years, a 51100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 971.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling and i752. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 30 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate i752 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling or i752, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.