AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling vs NVIDIA Xavier

General info

Comparison of graphics card architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters.

Place in our rating
not rated
not rated
GCN 5.0
GPU code name
Vega 10
Market segment
Launch date
7 August 2017 (3 years ago)
no data (2021 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)
no data
Price now

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results.

Pipelines / CUDA cores
no data
Core clock speed
1408 MHz
854 MHz
Boost clock
1668 MHz
1465 MHz
Number of transistors
12,500 million
no data
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm
12 nm
Thermal design power (TDP)
345 Watt
15 Watt
Texture fill rate
no data
Floating-point performance
14,336 gflops
no data

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

PCIe 3.0 x16
282 mm
no data
Supplementary power connectors
2x 8-pin
no data


Parameters of memory installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors don't have dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type
no data
Maximum RAM amount
8 GB
no data
Memory bus width
2048 Bit
no data
Memory clock speed
1890 MHz
no data
Memory bandwidth
483.8 GB/s
no data

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones. OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors
1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
No outputs

API support

APIs supported, including particular versions of those APIs.

12 (12_1)
12.0 (12_1)
Shader Model
no data
no data

Mining hashrates

Cryptocurrency mining performance of Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling and Xavier. Usually measured in megahashes per second.

Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto)
33.1 Mh/s
no data

Advantages of AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling

We are unaware of any advantages of AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling over NVIDIA Xavier.

Advantages of NVIDIA Xavier

Cheaper ($21 vs $246)

Finer manufacturing process technology (12 vs 14 nm)

Lower power consumption (15W vs 345W), meaning that the rival with higher TDP might require a better cooler or other thermal solution.

So, which one is the better CPU?

Technical City couldn't decide between AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling and NVIDIA Xavier. We've got no test results to judge.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Cast your vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of video cards with performance more or less close to those reviewed, providing you with more probable options to consider.

User rating

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

Advices and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.