GeForce GTX 480 512 vs Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameVega 10GF100
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date7 August 2017 (7 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$699 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4096512
Core clock speed1408 MHz527 MHz
Boost clock speed1668 MHzno data
Number of transistors12,500 million3,100 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)345 Watt375 Watt
Texture fill rate427.033.73
Floating-point processing power13.66 TFLOPSno data
ROPs6448
TMUs25664

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length282 mm292 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pin2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB1536 MB
Memory bus width2048 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed945 MHz2.8 GB/s
Memory bandwidth483.8 GB/s134.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
HDMI++

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.45.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.1
Vulkan1.1.125N/A
CUDA-2.0

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 1536 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 345 Watt 375 Watt

RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling has a 433.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 185.7% more advanced lithography process, and 8.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling and GeForce GTX 480 Core 512. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling
Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 Core 512
GeForce GTX 480 Core 512

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 22 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate GeForce GTX 480 Core 512 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.