RTX A2000 Mobile vs Radeon RX Vega 64 Limited Edition

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated211
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data18.56
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameVega 10GA106
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date7 August 2017 (7 years ago)12 April 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$549 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores40962560
Core clock speed1200 MHz893 MHz
Boost clock speed1536 MHz1358 MHz
Number of transistors12,500 million13,250 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)295 Watt95 Watt
Texture fill rate393.2108.6
Floating-point processing power12.58 TFLOPS6.953 TFLOPS
ROPs6448
TMUs25680
Tensor Coresno data80
Ray Tracing Coresno data20

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length282 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB4 GB
Memory bus width2048 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed945 MHz1375 MHz
Memory bandwidth483.8 GB/s176.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.1.1251.2
CUDA-8.6

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 August 2017 12 April 2021
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 295 Watt 95 Watt

RX Vega 64 Limited Edition has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

RTX A2000 Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 75% more advanced lithography process, and 210.5% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega 64 Limited Edition and RTX A2000 Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega 64 Limited Edition is a desktop card while RTX A2000 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Limited Edition
Radeon RX Vega 64 Limited Edition
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile
RTX A2000 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 17 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 64 Limited Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 93 votes

Rate RTX A2000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.