Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
625 vs RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
Combined performance score
RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) outperforms 625 by 9% in our combined benchmark results.
General info
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in performance ranking | 731 | 756 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Value for money | no data | 0.45 |
Architecture | Vega (2017−2021) | GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) |
GPU code name | Vega Raven Ridge | Polaris 24 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Release date | 7 January 2018 (6 years old) | 12 August 2019 (4 years old) |
Current price | no data | $68 |
Technical specs
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 384 | 384 |
Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | 1024 MHz |
Number of transistors | no data | 1,550 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 50 Watt |
Texture fill rate | no data | 24.58 |
Size and compatibility
Information on Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) and Radeon 625 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
Interface | no data | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | no data | None |
Memory
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | no data | DDR3, GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | no data | 4 GB |
Memory bus width | no data | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | no data | 2250 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | no data | 14.4 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | - |
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
Display Connectors | no data | No outputs |
API support
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 12_1 | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | no data | 6.3 |
OpenGL | no data | 4.6 |
OpenCL | no data | 2.0 |
Vulkan | no data | 1.2.131 |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
Full HD | 15
+25%
| 12−14
−25%
|
Performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 | 6−7
+0%
|
6−7
+0%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 8
+100%
|
4−5
−100%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 8
+14.3%
|
7−8
−14.3%
|
Battlefield 5 | 12
+100%
|
6−7
−100%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 6−7
+0%
|
6−7
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 5−6
+25%
|
4−5
−25%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 8
+100%
|
4−5
−100%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 10
+42.9%
|
7−8
−42.9%
|
Hitman 3 | 13
+160%
|
5−6
−160%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 9
+125%
|
4−5
−125%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 6−7
+0%
|
6−7
+0%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 7
−28.6%
|
9−10
+28.6%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 9
+800%
|
1−2
−800%
|
Full HD
High Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 7
+16.7%
|
6−7
−16.7%
|
Battlefield 5 | 7−8
+16.7%
|
6−7
−16.7%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 6−7
+0%
|
6−7
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 5−6
+25%
|
4−5
−25%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 9
+28.6%
|
7−8
−28.6%
|
Hitman 3 | 6−7
+20%
|
5−6
−20%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 5−6
+25%
|
4−5
−25%
|
Metro Exodus | 3
−33.3%
|
4−5
+33.3%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 6−7
+0%
|
6−7
+0%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 3
−200%
|
9−10
+200%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 9
+28.6%
|
7−8
−28.6%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 2−3
+100%
|
1−2
−100%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Battlefield 5 | 7−8
+16.7%
|
6−7
−16.7%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 6−7
+0%
|
6−7
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 5−6
+25%
|
4−5
−25%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 8−9
+14.3%
|
7−8
−14.3%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 6
−16.7%
|
7−8
+16.7%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 2−3
+100%
|
1−2
−100%
|
1440p
High Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
Hitman 3 | 6−7
+0%
|
6−7
+0%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 10−11
+0%
|
10−11
+0%
|
Metro Exodus | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 6−7
+0%
|
6−7
+0%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 5−6
+25%
|
4−5
−25%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 2−3
+100%
|
1−2
−100%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
4K
High Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
Hitman 3 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 8−9
+0%
|
8−9
+0%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Far Cry 5 | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 6−7
+0%
|
6−7
+0%
|
This is how RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) and Radeon 625 compete in popular games:
1080p resolution:
- RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) is 25% faster than Radeon 625
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) is 800% faster than the Radeon 625.
- in Shadow of the Tomb Raider, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the Radeon 625 is 200% faster than the RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000).
All in all, in popular games:
- RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) is ahead in 21 test (40%)
- Radeon 625 is ahead in 4 tests (8%)
- there's a draw in 28 tests (53%)
Advantages and disadvantages
Performance score | 3.03 | 2.79 |
Recency | 7 January 2018 | 12 August 2019 |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 50 Watt |
We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) and Radeon 625. The differences in performance seem too small.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar GPU comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.