Quadro K2000M Embedded vs Radeon RX Vega 56 Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameVega 10EXK107
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date1 June 2018 (7 years ago)22 March 2012 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3584384
Core clock speed1138 MHz835 MHz
Boost clock speed1301 MHz1058 MHz
Number of transistors12,500 million1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate291.433.86
Floating-point processing power9.326 TFLOPS0.8125 TFLOPS
ROPs6416
TMUs22432
L1 Cache896 KB32 KB
L2 Cache4 MB256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB2 GB
Memory bus width2048 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidth409.6 GB/s57.6 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort1x DVI
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)11.0 (11_0)
Shader Model6.45.1
OpenGL4.64.1
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.1.125N/A
CUDA-3.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 June 2018 22 March 2012
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 45 Watt

RX Vega 56 Mobile has an age advantage of 6 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

K2000M Embedded, on the other hand, has 167% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega 56 Mobile and Quadro K2000M Embedded. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega 56 Mobile is a notebook graphics card while Quadro K2000M Embedded is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 7 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 56 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 2 votes

Rate Quadro K2000M Embedded on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega 56 Mobile or Quadro K2000M Embedded, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.