Arc A380M vs Radeon RX Vega 56 Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameVega 10DG2-128
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 June 2018 (7 years ago)24 January 2023 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores35841024
Core clock speed1138 MHz1550 MHz
Boost clock speed1301 MHz2000 MHz
Number of transistors12,500 million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate291.4128.0
Floating-point processing power9.326 TFLOPS4.096 TFLOPS
ROPs6432
TMUs22464
Tensor Coresno data128
Ray Tracing Coresno data8
L1 Cache896 KBno data
L2 Cache4 MB4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16MXM-A (3.1)

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB6 GB
Memory bus width2048 Bit96 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz1937 MHz
Memory bandwidth409.6 GB/s186.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortPortable Device Dependent
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.1.1251.3
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 June 2018 24 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 35 Watt

RX Vega 56 Mobile has a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount.

Arc A380M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, a 133.3% more advanced lithography process, and 242.9% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega 56 Mobile and Arc A380M. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 Mobile
Radeon RX Vega 56 Mobile
Intel Arc A380M
Arc A380M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 7 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 56 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 18 votes

Rate Arc A380M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega 56 Mobile or Arc A380M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.