Arc A310 vs Radeon RX Vega 56 Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated425
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data13.38
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameVega 10DG2-128
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 June 2018 (7 years ago)12 October 2022 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3584768
Core clock speed1138 MHz2000 MHz
Boost clock speed1301 MHz2000 MHz
Number of transistors12,500 million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate291.464.00
Floating-point processing power9.326 TFLOPS3.072 TFLOPS
ROPs6416
TMUs22432
Tensor Coresno data96
Ray Tracing Coresno data6
L1 Cache896 KB1.1 MB
L2 Cache4 MB4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB4 GB
Memory bus width2048 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz1937 MHz
Memory bandwidth409.6 GB/s124.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.1.1251.3
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 June 2018 12 October 2022
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 75 Watt

RX Vega 56 Mobile has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

Arc A310, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, a 133% more advanced lithography process, and 60% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega 56 Mobile and Arc A310. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega 56 Mobile is a notebook graphics card while Arc A310 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 7 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 56 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 313 votes

Rate Arc A310 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega 56 Mobile or Arc A310, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.