Tesla V100 SMX2 vs Radeon RX Vega 5

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking722not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency21.87no data
ArchitectureVega (2017−2020)Volta (2017−2020)
GPU code nameVegaGV100
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date7 January 2020 (6 years ago)21 June 2017 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3205120
Core clock speedno data1370 MHz
Boost clock speed1400 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data21,100 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rateno data438.4
ROPsno data128
TMUsno data320

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataHBM2
Maximum RAM amountno data16 GB
Memory bus widthno data4096 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1758 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data900.1 GB/s
Shared memory--

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112.0
Shader Modelno data5.0
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.0
CUDA-7.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 January 2020 21 June 2017
Chip lithography 7 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 250 Watt

RX Vega 5 has an age advantage of 2 years, a 71% more advanced lithography process, and 1567% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega 5 and Tesla V100 SMX2. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega 5 is a notebook graphics card while Tesla V100 SMX2 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 238 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 5 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 5 votes

Rate Tesla V100 SMX2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega 5 or Tesla V100 SMX2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.