ATI Graphics Xpression vs Radeon RX Vega 5

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking717not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency21.82no data
ArchitectureVega (2017−2020)Mach (1992−1997)
GPU code nameVegaMach64
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date7 January 2020 (5 years ago)1 November 1995 (30 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores320no data
Core clock speedno data40 MHz
Boost clock speed1400 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data1 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm600 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Wattno data
ROPsno data1

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCI
Widthno data1-slot

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataEDO
Maximum RAM amountno data2 MB
Memory bus widthno data64 Bit
Memory clock speedno data40 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data320.0 MB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x VGA

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_1N/A
OpenGLno dataN/A
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 January 2020 1 November 1995
Chip lithography 7 nm 600 nm

RX Vega 5 has an age advantage of 24 years, and a 8471.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega 5 and Graphics Xpression. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega 5 is a notebook graphics card while Graphics Xpression is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 5
Radeon RX Vega 5
ATI Graphics Xpression
Graphics Xpression

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 236 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 5 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate Graphics Xpression on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega 5 or Graphics Xpression, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.