GeForce 9300M GS GDDR3 vs Radeon RX Vega 5

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking722not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency21.87no data
ArchitectureVega (2017−2020)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameVegaG98
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date7 January 2020 (6 years ago)4 June 2008 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3208
Core clock speedno data580 MHz
Boost clock speed1400 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data210 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt13 Watt
Texture fill rateno data2.320
Floating-point processing powerno data0.0232 TFLOPS
ROPsno data4
TMUsno data4
L2 Cacheno data16 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataMXM-I
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR3
Maximum RAM amountno data256 MB
Memory bus widthno data64 Bit
Memory clock speedno data702 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data11.23 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_111.1 (10_0)
Shader Modelno data4.0
OpenGLno data3.3
OpenCLno data1.1
Vulkan-N/A
CUDA-1.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 January 2020 4 June 2008
Chip lithography 7 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 13 Watt

RX Vega 5 has an age advantage of 11 years, and a 829% more advanced lithography process.

9300M GS GDDR3, on the other hand, has 15% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega 5 and GeForce 9300M GS GDDR3. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 238 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 5 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 3 votes

Rate GeForce 9300M GS GDDR3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega 5 or GeForce 9300M GS GDDR3, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.