GeForce 9300 SE vs Radeon RX Vega 5

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX Vega 5 with GeForce 9300 SE, including specs and performance data.

RX Vega 5
2020
15 Watt
4.03
+2139%

RX Vega 5 outperforms 9300 SE by a whopping 2139% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking7111451
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency21.73no data
ArchitectureVega (2017−2020)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameVegaG98
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date7 January 2020 (5 years ago)1 June 2008 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3208
Core clock speedno data540 MHz
Boost clock speed1400 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data210 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Wattno data
Texture fill rateno data4.320
Floating-point processing powerno data0.0208 TFLOPS
ROPsno data4
TMUsno data8
L2 Cacheno data16 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 2.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataDDR2
Maximum RAM amountno data256 MB
Memory bus widthno data64 Bit
Memory clock speedno data400 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data6.4 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_111.1 (10_0)
Shader Modelno data4.0
OpenGLno data3.3
OpenCLno data1.1
Vulkan-N/A
CUDA-1.1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD190−1

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 43
+4200%
1−2
−4200%
Cyberpunk 2077 9 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 11 0−1

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 22 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 29
+2800%
1−2
−2800%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10 0−1
Far Cry 5 15 0−1
Fortnite 52
+2500%
2−3
−2500%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 17 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 8 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18 0−1
Valorant 55−60
+2700%
2−3
−2700%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 18 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 7 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 50
+2400%
2−3
−2400%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10 0−1
Dota 2 39
+3800%
1−2
−3800%
Far Cry 5 12 0−1
Fortnite 21 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 20−22 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 15 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 13 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 9−10 0−1
Metro Exodus 4 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14 0−1
Valorant 55−60
+2700%
2−3
−2700%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 16 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10 0−1
Dota 2 37
+3600%
1−2
−3600%
Far Cry 5 12−14 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 20−22 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 9−10 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9 0−1
Valorant 55−60
+2700%
2−3
−2700%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 12 0−1

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 8−9 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 30−35
+3200%
1−2
−3200%
Grand Theft Auto V 4−5 0−1
Metro Exodus 3−4 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+3200%
1−2
−3200%
Valorant 45−50
+2200%
2−3
−2200%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 2−3 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 0−1
Far Cry 5 8−9 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 10−11 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 4−5 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7 0−1

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 8−9 0−1

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18 0−1
Valorant 21−24 0−1

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 1−2 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Dota 2 14−16 0−1
Far Cry 5 3−4 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 6−7 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6 0−1

4K
Epic

Fortnite 5−6 0−1

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.03 0.18
Recency 7 January 2020 1 June 2008
Chip lithography 7 nm 65 nm

RX Vega 5 has a 2138.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, and a 828.6% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX Vega 5 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 9300 SE in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega 5 is a notebook graphics card while GeForce 9300 SE is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 5
Radeon RX Vega 5
NVIDIA GeForce 9300 SE
GeForce 9300 SE

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 231 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 5 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 5 votes

Rate GeForce 9300 SE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega 5 or GeForce 9300 SE, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.